Halacha For Today

The Daily Halacha Site...For Those Who Want to Live Right

Home     Two For Today     Questions & Answers     Archives     Kosher Links     Yahrtzeit for Today     Poskim Photos/Bios     About Me /Contact Me     Parsha Potpourri     Disclaimer      

 

בס"ד

קול רנה וישועה באהלי צדיקים...ימין ד' עושה חיל

  

FOR HALACHA FOR TODAY WEEK IN REVIEW, CLICK HERE

 

 

 

Please Note: Parsha Potpourri is NOT written by Ben Olam Haba and is not affiliated with Halacha For Today, and is only carried on this website as a public service. Rabbi Alport does NOT write Halacha For Today

 

 

 

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!

      

 

Parsha Potpourri

Parshas Beshalach – Vol. 7, Issue 16

Compiled by Rabbi Ozer Alport

 

 

ויאמינו בד' ובמשה עבדו (14:31)

After witnessing the death of their Egyptian pursuers, the Torah testifies that the Jewish people believed in Hashem and His servant Moshe. After a year of witnessing constant miracles during the 10 plagues, how can it be that the Jews never came to believe in Hashem until this time?

The Darkei Mussar answers that there are two types of belief. One is predicated on intellectual proofs, and one is based on sensory knowledge. The Alter of Kelm explains the difference between them with a parable about a person who has never tasted bread.

If somebody explains to him its texture, taste, and filling qualities, he will accept the information intellectually, for he has no evidence to the contrary. If a second person comes and refutes the assertions of the first, the man may be tempted to believe the latter claims. On the other hand, somebody who has himself tasted bread even once and knows first-hand of its ability to satiate won’t be swayed by all of the “rational” arguments in the world that bread doesn’t satisfy.

Similarly, the faith of a person whose belief in Hashem is based on intellectual derivations may be called into question if he is challenged with powerful counter-arguments. Until they reached the Sea of Reeds, the Jews certainly believed in Hashem intellectually, but it was there that they reached the higher level of faith based on sensory knowledge. Rashi (15:2) writes that the clarity of the revelation there was so great that even the lowest maidservants reached tremendous levels in seeing and experiencing Hashem. This resulted in a completely unshakeable faith that they reached only at that time.

Rashi (15:20) notes that the Jewish women in Egypt were on a high level of trust in Hashem even before the revelation at the Sea of Reeds. Convinced that they would merit further miracles in the future, they brought along musical instruments to play while singing praises to Hashem.

More recently, there was a tremendous drought in Israel which threatened that year’s entire harvest. This would mean financial ruin for the farmers as well as possible starvation for those left with nothing to eat. Communal fast days and prayers passed unsuccessfully.

With little choice, the Rabbinic leaders ordered everybody to go to the Kosel (Western Wall) to pour out their hearts and plead for Divine mercy. After reciting several chapters of Tehillim and other appropriate prayers, the clear sky suddenly grew dark and full of ominous clouds, which shortly gave way to a full-fledged torrential downpour. Those present were so overjoyed by the answering of their prayers that they didn’t even care that they were getting soaked to the bone, all except for one elderly, wheelchair-bound Chassidic Rebbe who remained completely dry … because he brought an umbrella!

Life will surely send us many challenges in the areas of health, finances, and family. Although the tests that we receive are beyond our control, we can learn from our ancestors in Egypt that the choice to persevere through the trials and live each day with happiness and confidence is fully in our hands.

 

 

ויבא עמלק וילחם עם ישראל ברפידם (17:8)

            The Kli Yakar explains that in relating that Amalek attacked the Jewish people in Refidim, the Torah is hinting to the spiritual cause of their ability to have any physical power over the Jews. As long as the Jewish nation is in a state of internal peace and unity, Amalek has no capacity to harm them. Refidim contains within it the letters which form the root of the word פירוד – separation – alluding to the fact that when the Jews camped there, they were stricken by strife and discord (Rashi 19:2).

The Chiddushei HaRim suggests that this is also hinted to by the Torah’s emphasis in Parshas Ki Seitzei (Devorim 25:17) that we remember what Amalek did לך – to (the singular) you, as they hold no sway over a united Jewish nation. Rashi writes that Amalek struck at those who had been expelled by the Clouds of Glory from the Jewish camp as a result of their sins. Those individuals didn’t enjoy the merit of being part of the community, and they were therefore susceptible to Amalek’s attacks.

Haman, who was descended from Amalek, learned this lesson from his ancestors. The S’fas Emes notes that Haman described to Achashverosh (Esther 3:8) his desire to eradicate an עם מפוזר ומפורד. Literally, he described the Jews as a people who are scattered and dispersed around the world, but this may also be understood as a nation of people are who separated from one another and lacking in unity.

The Shelah HaKadosh writes that Esther recognized the true source of Haman’s power and immediately began efforts to unify the nation, instructing Mordechai (Esther 4:16) לך כנוס את כל היהודים – go gather together all of the Jews – not just physically but also symbolically. Not surprisingly, it was this national togetherness which prevailed, as is memorialized in the song Shoshanas Yaakov: צהלה ושמחה בראותם יחד תכלת מרדכי – the Jewish nation was cheerful and glad when they saw together that Mordechai was robed in royal blue. The lesson of Amalek should inspire us to feel new levels of togetherness with our fellow Jews in these difficult times for our people in which we live.

 

 

ויאמר כי יד על כס י-ה מלחמה לד' בעמלק מדר דר (17:16)

            After Amalek attacked the Jewish people in Refidim, Hashem swore that He would fight a battle against them in every generation until they are defeated and completely obliterated. However, in relating that He will place His hand upon His throne to take this oath, Rashi notes that the Torah writes the word כסא – throne – without the letter א at the end. Similarly, Hashem refers to Himself using a shortened version of His Name, using the name י-ה without the letters ו-ה which comprise the end of His name.

            The Avnei Shoham brilliantly uses Rashi’s comment to shed new light on words that we say every day in our prayers. According to Rashi, the three letters which are lacking from Hashem’s Name and throne are א, ו, and ה, which can be rearranged to spell the word הוא. In other words, our verse teaches that Hashem has declared a war against Amalek in every generation. When this is finally won, the letters in the word הוא will be returned to their rightful places, at which time His name and throne will be restored to their complete glory and His kingship will be permanently established.

            In the morning prayers, after the recitation of Shema, we say a paragraph which begins אמת ויציב. In this paragraph, we proclaim לדור ודור הוא קים ושמו קים וכסאו נכון ומלכותו ואמונתו לעד קימת. This can be interpreted as a declaration that לדור ודור – after the war against Amalek which is waged in each generation is successfully completed – then הוא קים – the letters in the word הוא, which have been lacking, will be returned to their rightful places. After these letters are restored, we will see that שמו קים וכסאו נכון – Hashem’s name and throne are established and lasting, and מלכותו ואמונתו לעד קימת – His kingdom and faithfulness will be permanent and endure forever.

            Our Sages teach that the Anshei K’nesses HaGedolah – Men of the Great Assembly – wrote the text of our prayers with Divine assistance. Unfortunately, because we are accustomed to say the words so frequently, we often fail to grasp the tremendous layers of meaning that they placed into each word and phrase. The recognition of the beautiful meaning latent in a phrase that many people say almost by rote should inspire us to seek out the hidden layers waiting to be uncovered in other areas of our daily prayers.

 

 

Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

 

1)      On the way out of Egypt, Hashem chose not to lead the Jewish people by way of the nearby land of the Philistines because He feared that when they would see a war there, they would get scared and return to Egypt (13:17). As Rashi writes (13:18) that the Jews left Egypt armed with weapons, why would they be afraid to witness wars which they clearly knew they may encounter and for which they had already taken steps to prepare? (Ayeles HaShachar)

2)      In the blessing said in the morning following Krias Shema, we say וים סוף בקעת וזדים טבעת וידידים העברת ויכסו מים צריהם אחד מהם לא נותר – and You split the Sea of Reeds, and You drowned the wicked sinners, and You brought across Your dear ones, and the water covered their oppressors, and not a single one of them remained. Why is it written in a manner which seems far from chronologically accurate? (Siddur Rokeach, Moshav Z’keinim, Taam V’Daas)

3)      The Daas Z’keinim writes (15:1) that the Song at the Sea begins אז ישיר – and they sang – because the numerical value of the word אז is eight, which hints to the fact that the Sea of Reeds split in the merit of the mitzvah of circumcision, which is performed on the eighth day of a boy’s life. Why did it split specifically in the merit of this mitzvah? (Zahav Sh’va)

4)      Rashi writes (17:16) that י-ה is considered an incomplete name of Hashem’s, as it is missing the final two letters (ו-ה) until Amalek is completely obliterated. The Gemora in Sotah (17a) states that if a husband and wife are meritorious, the Divine Presence will dwell between them. Rashi there explains that the Hebrew word for man (איש) contains the letter י from Hashem’s name and the word for woman (אשה) contains the letter ה from Hashem’s name. Why does Rashi seem to imply that even in the best-case scenario, a righteous and loving couple will only merit the dwelling in their home of an incomplete name of Hashem? (Darash Moshe)

 

 

Answers to Points to Ponder:

 

         1) Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman writes that there is a major difference between intellectual awareness of an idea and physically experiencing it. In this case, even though the Jewish people took steps which indicated that they were clearly aware of the possibility of war, Hashem knew that if they were actually exposed to it, it would be so overwhelming and traumatic that they would elect to return to Egypt.

 

2) The Moshav Z'keinim explains that when the Egyptians chased the Jewish people into the Sea of Reeds, Hashem transformed the ground under them into muddy clay, which caused them to sink and prevented them from pursuing the fleeing Jews. Only after the Jewish people had safely emerged onto dry land did Hashem instruct Moshe to return the waters to their normal position, at which time the Egyptians drowned. In light of this, the wording of our prayers is accurate, as Hashem first split the sea for us, then caused the Egyptians to sink into the ground, then brought us through the water onto dry land, and finally covered the Egyptians with the water and drowned them. Rav Moshe Shternbuch adds that Hashem did this to enable them to cross through the sea calmly without needing to worry about the possibility that the Egyptians would catch up to them. Alternatively, the Rokeach writes that when the water split, it first traveled throughout Egypt and drowned the wicked Egyptians who remained behind. After the Jews crossed through onto dry land, the water then returned to drown the Egyptians who had pursued them into the sea, which explains our twofold reference to the Egyptians drowning as well as the order of events.

 

3) Rav Shimon Greenfeld explains that the water in the sea had a dilemma. On the one hand, Moshe was ordering it to split to allow the Jews to pass through. On the other hand, the laws of nature that Hashem instituted when He created the universe mandated that the water should continue to flow normally. However, the Medrash Tanchuma (Tazria 5) teaches that the acts of the righteous are even greater than those of Hashem, a concept which it proves from the mitzvah of circumcision, which is performed by man to complete a child created by Hashem. Therefore, in the merit of this mitzvah, the sea followed Moshe's orders instead of Hashem's laws of nature, and it split so that the Jews could pass through.

 

4) Rav Moshe Feinstein suggests that Hashem initially blesses a couple with only part of His name in order to give them a foundation on which to build and expand, but they must be cognizant of the fact that this level is incomplete and it is up to them to complete Hashem’s name and bring His blessing into their home through their actions.

 

 

© 2012 by Ozer Alport. To subscribe, send comments, or sponsor an issue, email oalport@optonline.net